THE EDUCATOR

JANUARY - JUNE 2003

Inclusive Education in Brazil: Advances and Contradictions
- Mara Syaulis and Marilda Bruno

Contents |  Previous |  Next
 

     Brazil is a signatory both to the Jomtien Agreement (Thailand, 1990) and to the World Declaration on Education for All (Salamanca, 1993) which support educational practices aimed at satisfying the basic learning needs of individuals, the full development of their human potential, and the improvement of their quality of life and knowledge and participation as citizens in the cultural transformation of their community.

      In line with this commitment, Brazil's National Educational Guidelines of 1996 and the National Guidelines for Special Education in Primary Education recommend the inclusion of people who have serious disabilities or significant learning difficulties in mainstream education systems. To this end it proposes that the Union, the States and Municipal governments collaborate in order to implement inter-sector initiatives that facilitate and put into operation educational systems that will address the specific and educational needs arising from disabilities.

      There has been significant development in Brazil relating to the concept of Special Educational Needs, and national guidelines have been produced to encourage educational systems to organize and restructure themselves and to develop educational programs and inclusion plans jointly with families, schools and specialized institutions that provide support for inclusion.

      In the area of childhood education, there has been a great advance in the acceptance of the concept of education as a social right. The medical model of caregiving, based upon a clinical approach to early intervention, has evolved towards a social-educational focus that values diversity, family life and the modification of the environment to promote the development and learning processes of children with Special Educational Needs.

      The Ministry of Education, acting through the National Office of Special Education together with Primary Education, has developed practical advice in the form of Educational Strategies and Guidelines for the Education of Children with Special Educational Needs (2003). The eight volumes of the guidelines include: Introduction, Accentuated Learning Difficulties or Limitations in the Developmental Process, Autism, Multiple Disabilities, Physical Disabilities, Communication and Signing Difficulties, Visual Impairment, Hearing Impairment, Deafblindness and Gifted Children. These materials will be distributed to each of the 5.800 Brazilian municipalities who will become responsible for their local dissemination and for putting their content into practice.

      Similarly, materials have been developed for the development of human resources to support the inclusion of students with disabilities in mainstream classrooms at the level of primary education. These include guidance for class teachers on teaching strategies, access to the curriculum, curricular access, adaptation of materials and the additional curriculum. In the area of visual impairment three documents have been prepared: Understanding Visual Impairment, The Education of Visually-Impaired Students and Rehabilitation.

      The Ministry of Education, through the National Office of Special Education in partnership with ABEDEV - the Brazilian Association of Educators of People with Visual Impairment - created 25 CAPs - Teaching Support Centers for Inclusion - a project conceived by Marilda Moares Garcia Bruno, a member of ICEVI-Brazil. This project was implemented by the Ministry of Education to provide support and assistance for the inclusion of children and young people with visual impairment and support for teachers and parents in various Brazilian states.

      The Teaching Support Centers produce Braille and large print books, run workshops on adapting teaching materials and resources and make available assistive technology resources that students can use at the centers. They also take on responsibility for providing training and carrying out educational research in partnership with universities and specialist organizations.

      Large urban centers are served by specialist organizations such as Laramara, the Fundacao Dorina Nowill and the Santa Casa de Misericordia in Sao Paulo; CEPRE in Campinas; the Instituto Benjamin Constant in Rio de Janeiro and the Instituto de Cegos in Salvador, Bahia among others. These organizations provide a range of services incuding the assessment of vision, early intervention programs, evaluation and guidance for integration developments, and student based programs such as orientation and mobility, daily living activities, communication, Braille and abacus techniques. They also provide adaptive technology and other special aids.

      The great challenge facing our country is the inclusion of students with multiple disabilities in schools. To respond to this challenge, Lararama, in Sao Paulo, has led study groups on inclusion and has provided further education and training for teachers with an ecological focus aimed at developing leadership within families and communities to face problems encountered in daily life. It has also created specialized support materials on inclusion for students, teachers and parents and furnished specialized equipment and technical assistance to enable access to the curriculum. For example, since 1999, Laramara has distributed 1681 Perkins braille writers and 152 Tatrapoint braille writers throughout the country, 1001 of which have been delivered at no cost to visually impaired users with the support of sponsors and donation campaigns.

      Brazil is an immense country, full of contradictions. It is undeniable that in the last 10 years our country has made great strides in the area of legislation, and has developed recommendations and guidelines to ensure the social rights and inclusion of people with visual impairment in schools, the workplace and society. However, what leaves us perplexed is the fact that even though there are services available such as the ones we have mentioned, in practice, students with visual impairment and their families cannot find in all schools the necessary resources and support to meet their specific needs.

 
Contents |  Previous |  Next