Home| Keynote Speeches| Workshop Papers| Other Documents


Saving the Baby While Getting Rid of the Bath Water:

A New Look at Residential Schools

by

Lars Guldager, Ph. D. and Rebecca D. Earl, Ph.D.

In the United States today, the concept of diversity is widely embraced. Diversity, as the word is most often used, means that people of all races and ethnic groups, abilities and disabilities live and work together in a way that celebrates their differences while emphasizing their similarities.
We are a diverse country. We have laws that promote diversity. Over the last three decades, we have made major strides in employment and educational equity for people of color. We have passed laws and regulations in every state to address previous inequities for racial and ethnic minorities. And, in the past two decades, first with education and employment legislation in the 70's and then, more recently, with the stricter access requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, people with disabilities have achieved a voice. It is a voice that has argued for the right to participate in the lives of their communities as any citizen may. It is a voice that has said count me in, don't count me out. As a result of this strong self-advocacy, today, we are beginning to count people with disabilities among the groups that should be included the mainstream of society for it to be appropriately diverse.
It is this diversity movement that has been both the impetus and the support for the movement of children and adults with disabilities from institutions into the real world. American society is more accepting of differences now than ever before in our history. Because of that, those of us working in the field of special education have taken full advantage of every opportunity to move students into settings more like the world they will face as adults. At The Connecticut Institute for the Blind/Oak Hill, a residential private school for over 100 years, that move has meant a significant challenge.
We were challenged to maintain the residential services that families and school districts sought for the students they sent us who have severe multiple disabilities. We wanted to respond to the need for more suitable community inclusion without sacrificing the gains that we all have seen in children who have the consistency of program 24 hours a day. We wanted to maintain the high standards of education that Oak Hill had built its reputation around. And, we wanted to do the right thing for children.
We have found what I believe to be the solution. The Oak Hill School program combines the best of both the residential school and the community-based program and has, indeed, done the right thing for children. It has not, however, been without difficulties in adjustments for students and staff alike.
Today, the Oak Hill School program is totally decentralized. Rather than a single campus with classrooms and living facilities in one location, we have students living in small (5 to 6 person) group homes in communities spread around our small state. Most of our students attend classes that we staff and operate in public school buildings in or near the towns in which the group homes are located. Others of our classes, those for older students, are located in shopping areas or small industrial parks near to jobs and the comings and goings of other people at work. In all instances, students are a part of their school and home communities.
To be more specific, let's look at a day in the lives of two of our students. They were each chosen to be representative of the other students and can provide a clear picture of the range and types of programs offered.
First, let me introduce Mark. Mark is eleven years old. He has lived at home until last year when the severity of his cerebral palsy, mental retardation, and other very complicated health disabilities began to overwhelm his family. They looked around for a school near their home where regular visits would be possible. They also wanted Mark to have the opportunity to know other children who do not have disabilities. Oak Hill School became the obvious choice.
Mark now lives in a nearby town in a small group home with four other children who also have serious medical disabilities. Our group homes are in residential neighborhoods across Connecticut and are so much a part of the neighborhoods that, unless people are specifically told, they are unable to pick our home out from others on the street. Mark's new home is well furnished. Each child has his or her own bedroom and the common areas are set up to accommodate the wheelchairs and special adaptive devices necessary while still maintaining a real homey look.
The staff at Mark's house are all thoroughly trained by Oak Hill before they ever are allowed to care for a child. We have a rigorous one week pre-service orientation training program for all new employees and then annual updating of skills in all areas for all direct care staff. Because of the special medical needs in this particular home, one of the staff members must be a nurse. The other staff, and the group home manager, do not have medical backgrounds, but are experienced in working with children whose health is as fragile as Mark's.
In this home, as in all our homes, the students are asked and expected to do as much for themselves as is within their capabilities. We educate for independence at whatever level that is possible. So, the morning routine at Mark's house looks very much like the morning routine at your house, or mine. The awake staff member (a licensed practical nurse) who comes on duty at 11:00 p.m. stays until 9:00 a.m. to be extra hands in assisting with wake-ups, showers, dressing and breakfast. Then it's off to school.
Mark and his house-mates are transported by Oak Hill staff in a specialized van equipped to carry all five wheelchairs. School, about five miles away, is a middle school for that community and is populated by a highly diverse student body of seventh and eighth graders. The Oak Hill classroom was designed for our purposes by our own staff through an interesting arrangement negotiated with the school district.
In our search to accommodate Oak Hill students in educational environments with nondisabled peers, we approached this district to inquire about leasing classroom space. There was none available, but they did have an unfinished space in the lower, arts level of the middle school building that we could use. We agreed to finish the space using our materials and labor in return for a five year payment-free lease with a renewable option after the five years. The space is wonderful, replete with built-ins and ample space for wheelchairs and the myriad specialized (and always bulky) equipment needed for students who have multiple disabilities.
The classroom is staffed with a certified special education teacher, two aides, one licensed practical nurse and a phalanx of therapists who come in and out to meet the students' programs. While the classroom instruction and format may look familiar to many who work with this population of students, there is an interesting addition. We have the benefit of student help from the middle school program. During the course of the day, the classroom is visited by at least ten seventh and eighth graders who have been assigned to our class by their teachers. Some come to work on their own homework sitting near one of their Oak Hill friends like Mark, some come to work on the computer with a buddy from our class and still others come to play educational games and to be helpers.
We are told that many of the middle school teachers use participation in our program as rewards for good behavior. However it works, it's working. Our students have benefited from their interactions with these students. Their behaviors show longer periods of sustained attention to task, more frequent and longer eye contact, more attempts at communication and generally happier affect when they are involved with their friends. The middle schoolers are, in turn, learning about themselves and others in a totally new context. They find it "cool" to be in our classroom. Many have never had any contact whatsoever with anyone with a disability, and have found it to be interesting – as in "if Amy is blind, how does she know when I'm here?"—challenging—as in "how can I make Steve stop trying to bite me?"—and gratifying—as in "I can tell that Carlos likes me because he smiles whenever he hears my voice". One very real measure of benefit is demonstrated by the fact that the middle school students continue to make their classroom visits during their school holidays while we're still in session.
Mark spends six hours each day in school. His instruction is delivered according to his individualized education program, a mandated document drawn up for him by a team that includes educators, therapists, his parents, and his residential manager. The communication between home and school keeps the program consistent. Because so much of what is taught are daily living skills, they must be practiced and applied across all settings. Everyone who works with Mark is informed about his program, his progress and his next steps.
After school, Mark can take it easy for a bit, but not for long. Recreational activities are planned for further community integration. Walks in the park, visits to playgrounds, shopping at the mall, and going to the local recreation center take up much of the time between school and dinner. And, from then on, life at the group home looks like life at our homes again, with TV and stories and quiet games and showers and bedtime.
Mark's family, and the families of the other students in the house, visit frequently. Their presence creates the feeling of an extended family for all and ensures that there's always a supply of home-baked cookies around. Parents take their children home for short visits, but we have found that, with students who have serious medical needs, they are most comfortable visiting in the group home where staff assistance is immediately available.
Now, let me tell you about Rita. Rita's situation is only somewhat different from Mark's. Rita is about Mark's age, but her multiple disabilities do not include compromised health. Rita is considered to be deaf-blind. She has a fairly sophisticated sign language vocabulary, is turning into a computer whiz and has amazed her nondisabled peers with her artistic abilities.
Rita also lives in an Oak Hill group home with five other children. Her home and the activities there are just as structured as those at Mark's house with highly trained staff on duty at all times, however, a nurse is on call rather than on duty. Rita's house-mates do not have the degree of medical involvement as Mark's and they tend to have somewhat more cognitive ability.
Rita attends class in a public school in a town about fifteen miles from her home. Her classroom is located in an elementary school in which students are as old as ten years. Some of Rita's classmates are somewhat older than the students at the school, initially giving us some cause for concern. It needn't have. Because of the developmental delays, most of our students were smaller in stature than would befit their early adolescence. To have placed their classroom in the only other available space, i.e. at the high school, could easily have turned our children from people to mascots, from peers to children seen as much younger and therefore in need of "care" rather than friendship.
Rita and her classmates benefit from interactions with the other students in many more ways than is possible for Mark in his more medically controlled setting. During the day, nearly twenty students come into the class to work on special projects with Oak Hill students. The partners are assigned by our teacher working closely with the other teachers to create the best matches and projects. Additionally, our students are taken to the playground by buddies. They participate with friends from other classrooms for visits to the school library. They eat their lunches in the school cafeteria. Some, like Rita, go into other classrooms to take part in subjects like art and, in return, some of the students not enrolled in our program come into our classroom for short periods of specialized instruction. We conduct regular sign language classes for students and their teachers and have been very pleased with the interest and the turnout.
Our community school experiences speak volumes about the professionalism and caring of educators. All this interaction is voluntary on the part of the receiving school; all we do is lease the classroom space. The resourceful staff of Oak Hill and the welcoming arms of the school community have brought about the rest. The inclusion effort is so successful that the relationships formed during the school day have now become extended to after-school activities as well. We invite friends to our home to play, for holiday parties and just to hang out. It is exciting to know that that is reciprocated from time to time. Rita recently attended a friend's birthday party. Her parents were thrilled.
Aside from the social benefits that we believe are obvious, we see a marked difference in our students' behaviors. They appear to use their friends as role models. They seek more direct interaction with other students than with staff, and they are less likely to act out. For their friends, we are told that self-images are enhanced, that peer interactions are more positive and that their patience and self restraint are enhanced.
Rita's instruction also is based on an individualized education program. It is carried out, as is Mark's, in all aspects of her educational day. For a residential student, that translates into about 14 to 15 waking hours. No small task.
Mark and Rita are just two of the twenty-three students who attend Oak Hill School. Our sponsoring agency, The Connecticut Institute for the Blind, operates 69 group homes and has day and residential programs in over 40 Connecticut towns, serving nearly 400 individuals with disabilities. The School is a small part of what we do, but is our roots and continues as a very important program. It formed the basis for a fully developed, decentralized program of community-based services for children and adults with disabilities. No longer do we run programs "on the hill behind the fence". Our classes and other programs are in the world. Our program participants benefit from the interactions they have daily with people in that real world. They also have the benefit of the structured support that is most readily available in a residential program. We have, I believe, created the best of both worlds and have the smiles to prove it.

Return to the top of this page