Home| Keynote Speeches| Workshop Papers| Other Documents


STRATEGIES FOR INVOLVING PARENTS OF VISUALLY IMPAIRED CHILDREN, PROFESSIONALS AND THE WIDER COMMUNITY AS PARTNERS IN ACHIEVING FULL ACCESS TO EDUCATION FOR THESE CHILDREN.

 

BY BULUS L. YAKSAT & KATHRYN E. HILL,

GINDIRI MATERIAL CENTRE FOR THE HANDICAPPED,

NIGERIA.

INTRODUCTION.

Attitude to disabled persons has a very significant influence on the provision of Special Education in developing countries affecting every aspect. However, as attitude is learnt from family and society, it is possible to develop strategies to counter condition people so as to develop more positive attitudes. Oke and Ajeigbe (in Nwazuoke and Kolo 1996) cite Johnson (1979) who sees attitudes as:
"a combination of concepts, verbal information and emotions that result in a predisposition to respond favourably or unfavourably towards particular people, groups, ideas, events or objects."
Nigeria is a multi-ethnic nation and each tribe has its own culture which influences the attitude of tribal members to disabled people. There is therefore no homogenous `Nigerian cultural attitude' to anything. However, both Ogbue (1981) and Obani (1982, citing Jonson 1957, Nduku 1964, and Okediji and Ogionwo 1970 as sources) collated and synthesized the beliefs of many Nigerian cultures regarding the causes of handicapping conditions. These are seen as any one of, or a combination of:
(1) A curse on the family or the wider community for offenses against God or the gods;
(2) Anger of the ancestors or ancestral gods for neglect or breached promises;
(3) Punishment of the child for offenses committed in a previous incarnation;
(4) Punishment for a parent's misdemeanor;
(5) A potential evil person curtailed by the gods;
(6) Punishment for offenses against the laws of the land or breaches of custom;
(7) Wicked acts of witches and wizards.
In the light of such beliefs about the causes of handicaps, it is hardly surprising that attitudes to disabled Nigerians are generally negative! Despite this, some Nigerian cultures treat their handicapped members favourably for a variety of reasons. For example, where the handicap is believed to be caused by a malevolent god, some groups will treat the handicapped child well to avoid further offending the god. One of the pillars of Islam is almsgiving, thus beggars may be considered to be bringing a blessing to others by providing them with an opportunity of earning merit (Jaquess 1977 and Laoye 1982). Thus in Muslim areas, handicapped beggars will normally receive alms, often being regarded as those whom `Allah the supreme God has created that the laws may be fulfilled' (Ogbue 1981 and Obani 1981). However this can also fuel negative attitudes as handicapped beggars are seen as dependent and helpless.

Against this background there is an increasing interest among Nigerian Special Educators in studying attitude and how it can be changed. Ozoji (1991,1993) states that integration aims at promoting close interaction between disabled and non-disabled
children in early life, and this hope of integration dispelling negative and prejudiced attitudes towards the disabled, is shared by most Nigerian Special Educators. This is based on the principle, that attitudes are learnt and are acquired through experiences, from which it follows that positive experiences can lead to positive attitude change.

NIGERIAN LEGISLATION ON SPECIAL EDUCATION.
As early as 1954, the (then) Western Region`s Education Law stated that special schools should be available for children with serious difficulties, while a similar regulation was enacted in Northern Nigeria in 1962. Other relevant acts are Lagos Education Act, 1957 (Article 61g), the Northern Nigeria Education Law of 1964 (section 3 para. 3) and the Western Region Law Section 8812. (Jaquess 1979, Hill and Shown 1995).

The declaration by the (then) Head of State Major General Yakubu Gowon, in a nation-wide broadcast in 1974 that henceforth the Government would provide special education, was a turning point. Consequent upon that, the Third Nation Development Plan (1975-80) made provision for the training of Special Education Teachers and emphasized the need for facilities for the education of the disabled.

However it was the 1977 National Policy on Education following on from the introduction of Universal Primary Education in 1976, which made it mandatory that Special Education arrangements must be made for the handicapped.
The introduction in 1988 of `Elements of Special Education' as compulsory in Teacher Education courses in Nigeria is another significant step forward as it should, in time, raise the level of awareness of special education needs and of the potential of handicapped students (Hill & Shown 1995). This, in turn, should have a positive effect on the attitude of teachers, and by extension of the general public.

THE ADEQUACY OF NIGERIAN SPECIAL EDUCATION.
On paper, special education provision in Nigeria is second to none in Africa, but sadly the actuality often falls far short of the theoretical provision. For example, the National Policy on Education Para.55(b) gives one of the objectives of special education as being `to provide adequate education for all handicapped children...'. This leads to the consideration of what is `an adequate education' and whether handicapped Nigerian children are receiving it. In our modern technological age, few would deny that an `adequate education' should ensure that those educated are adequately grounded in science, technology and mathematics (STM), but it is this aspect that is often woefully inadequate or even totally absent in the schooling received by handicapped Nigerians, especially if their handicap is visual. Although mathematics (or at least arithmetic) is normally taught at special schools for the blind, once a blind student enters his/her integrated secondary school (all secondary education of the blind in Nigeria is in integrated schools) he/she is likely to be `excused' or even actively excluded from mathematics or the practical aspects of science and technology, thus receiving an education that is far from an `adequate' preparation for life in an increasingly scientifically and technologically orientated Nigeria (Hill 1991, 1994, Hill & Jurmang 1993, 1996a, Jurmang et al 1996).

STRATEGIES FOR OVERCOMING THESE PROBLEMS.
A. ATTITUDINAL PROBLEMS:
There has never been a problem without an attempted solution! It has long been the wish of every Nigerian Professional in Special education that attitude towards the disabled might become more favorable. Many of the problems of handicapped people in Nigeria, and indeed world wide, are caused not so much by their disability per se, but by society's negative attitudes. Knowing that attitude is dynamic and therefore subject to change, Gindiri Material Centre for the Handicapped (GMCH) has developed strategies aimed at exposing people to new experiences designed to change attitudes for the better.

(1) Conference for Parents:
These are organized biennially and two have been held so far. That of 1994 (when the Centre was Gindiri Material Centre for the Visually Handicapped, GMCVH) was for the parents of blind children, while that of 1996 (when our new wider vision of seeking to serve all types of handicapped Nigerians had led to the change to our present name) was for the parent of every handicapped child. All sessions were conducted in both English (the official language of Nigeria) and Hausa (the `trade language' of the northern part of the country). In each conference a wide variety of topics were covered. Information was presented to counteract myths, generalizations and other false beliefs that lead to negative attitudes; techniques included talks, role-play, discussions and counter-attitudinal advocacy. Counselling sessions created avenues for intensive discussions on parental and community involvement and requirements. A number of sessions were led by blind or partially sighted staff members. Their competence and professionalism had an enormous impact on parents. Seeing these positive `role models' raised their expectations for their own visually handicapped children. One mother confided that for the first time she began to believe that her own blind son would be able to `make it' in life. Caring parents of blind children often over protect them. Our blind resource persons spoke of the importance of teaching blind children to do all the household tasks expected of their siblings. They gave illustrations of their involvement in such tasks as children and how that experience helped them as bachelors doing all their own house-hold tasks. Because they are blind they made a much bigger impact than we, their sighted colleagues could possibly have done. Activities under blindfold were also found to have a big impact. The positive results of 1994 conference on the parents' attitude to their children was evidenced by the enthusiastic testimony of the children when they resumed school in the term after the conference. All report that their families showed better understanding of them and an increase in provision of money,clothes and equipment. (Hill & Jurmang 1996b).

(2) Nursery/Primary Integration Schemes.
In line with Ozoji's (1991, 1993) recommendation of integration at an early age as a strategy to promote positive attitudes to the disabled (mentioned in the introduction) GMCH actively promotes integration of blind children into their local primary schools. The four integration schemes for visually handicapped primary school children started with the discovery that James had spent a year at primary school at Marit doing all his work orally. Visits were made to the school, the home,and the Local Education Authority and medical advice was also sought as to whether anything could be done to restore James' sight. On the first visit, James and his teacher were introduced to the braille code. Text books and braille writing materials were provided and, at an early stage a `mini-workshop' was held in the school to familiarize all the staff with James' problems and needs. When he reached primary four, James was provided with a typewriter and taught to type. Regular visits are made by the Centre's Schools Liaison Officer and recently James spent two weeks of his holiday at Gindiri being intensively coached in braille and typing. At Angwan Goje, after much discussion and on the Centre's advice, the Local Education Authority posted first one then, as the integration programme grew, two blind teachers already in their employment to the school. These cope with the special curriculum, so the Centre's role became less active, being now mainly that of the supply of braille books and paper. The other two programmes are equally varied and tailored to the needs, resources and circumstances of the student(s), school and Local Education Authority. In the early stages of the establishment of such programme, lengthy discussions with all involved are often needed to dispel negative attitudes, but these and the `mini-workshops' have been found to be very effective in promoting attitude change. In the latter, activities under blindfold and the use of blind resource persons have again proved to be very effective strategies. Simple adaptation to teaching techniques to ensure the pupil is not marginalised are also taught. These include such simple advice as reading out aloud anything written on the chalk board, and naming objects rather than using the words `this' and `that'.

B. THE INADEQUACY OF THE CURRICULUM.
The paucity of STM provision for visually impaired Nigerian secondary students mentioned above, and which itself arises from negative attitudes, is tackled by GMCH in two main ways.

(1) Workshops on STM and STM Related Topics.
From its founding in 1989 as GMCVH the Centre has run at least one workshop per year on STM and related topics. These are one week (Monday to Friday) practical workshops aimed at persuading STM teachers that visually impaired students can successfully take part in all aspects of STM including much practical work, and equipping the STM teacher with the knowledge and skills necessary for this. They are taught simple improvisations and adaptations of standard apparatus. For example each participant is provided with an ordinary, easily available wooden ruler and shown how to carve notches at each 1cm mark to convert it to a tactile ruler. They then attach a T-piece to convert it to a tactile T-square to facilitate the drawing of horizontal and vertical lines, right-angles, graph axes, etc. Similarly they are shown how to punch holes or affix staple pins at each 1cm mark on an ordinary tape measure so that it can be used by a blind person. Used plastic syringes in various sizes (washed and minus their needles of course) are converted to a very accurate `tactile pipettes' by cutting notches in the plunger to align with the marks on the barrel. Once the participants have adapted the apparatus, they use it to do practical exercises under blindfold. The emphasis is on improvisations and adaptations that are easy to do and which use cheap and easily available materials. Hill and Jurmang (1996a) in their survey of the changing attitudes to blind students participation in STM classes from l980 to 1995,noted that the workshops run by the Centre `... have not only enhanced the awareness level of the participants but have also gone a long way towards changing their attitudes from negative to positive'. They further declared that; `There is no doubt that these workshops have contributed to improved opportunities for Plateau State Blind Students to study STM'.Centre staff have also provided resource persons for an STM workshop in Cross Rivers State, Nigeria and for two in Ghana. Where appropriate, the Centre runs `mini-workshops' in secondary schools integrating blind students, and STM features strongly in these.

Additionally individuals or small groups of blind STM students are helped with individual or small group tuition. Over several years a number of adults who have been blinded after studying STM have come for individual tuition in braille maths and science codes. They include a university lecturer in biochemistry, a biology/chemistry teacher, a secondary school leaver, an electrical engineer and a university student blinded in the fifth year of a civil engineering course and who, with the help given has been able to transfer to a degree course in mathematics.

Support and help is given to blind students of STM at secondary and tertiary level. Currently there are two blind students studying for a B.Sc in mathematics, one is mentioned above and the other (Emmanuel) went through the whole school system after being blinded at the age of six. He was, in fact, our STM pioneer being the first blind student we know of to study all the sciences, maths and further maths at SSCE (Senior Secondary Certificate of Education) level - all with the Centre's help and support. Not only does Emmanuel benefit from the Centre's help, but is employed there in his university vacations to braille STM materials and to coach small groups of primary and secondary students in maths. Using him as a resource person in this way, not only helps the students in their actual maths, but is a great help in changing the negative attitudes of both blind students and their teachers to STM for the blind to positive attitudes - after all, he is the living proof that success IS possible.

(2) Paper presentations at Education Workshops and Conferences.
Not only are Nigerian teachers generally, and STM teachers in particular, largely ignorant of the feasibility and desirability of including visually impaired students in STM classes, but Nigerian special educators are often equally ignorant in this regard, and they often discourage visually impaired students from attempting STM. To this end, the Centre has a policy of presenting papers at Science Education, Special Education and Teacher Education Workshops and Conferences. STAN (Science Teachers Association of Nigeria) runs ten subject panel workshops and a conference each year, and GMCH aims to make practical presentations at two of them per year, and to eventually cover all the subject panels at least once. To date presentations have been made at two annual conferences and at Integrated Science, Biology, Chemistry, Maths and Teacher Education Panel Workshops. Such presentations always include hands-on participation under blindfold. At both Special and Teacher Education Conferences, the presentations aim to include the necessity of including blind students in all aspects of STM classes. Like the STM workshops, these paper presentations are slowly having positive effects on the attitudes of Nigerian teachers and teacher educators and the Centre sees this as an important aspect of its work.

CONCLUSION.
When Gindiri Material Centre for the Visually Handicapped was established in 1989, only one of the approximately one dozen secondary schools in Plateau State which accepted blind students included them in Mathematics, Chemistry or Physics classes. To the best of our knowledge, there was no other school in the country with a blind student studying all the sciences at Senior Secondary Level. Largely as result of the strategies outlined above, most of the Plateau State Secondary Schools which integrate VI students, now teach them mathematics and include them in the practical aspects of STM. Similarly, it is as a result of Emmanuel succeeding so well in his University Maths course that the blind Civil Engineering student was so easily able to transfer to the same course. Changing the negative attitudes of a society is not done easily or quickly but the Centre's Parents' Conferences, primary integration programmes and presentations at professional conferences are gradually converting individuals from having negative attitudes to the disabled to having positive attitudes. From here, the ripples gradually spread, and at least in our own locality, we are seeing the growth of positive attitudes.

REFERENCES.

FED. GOVT. OF NIG. (1977) New National Policy on Education, Fed. Govt. Press, Lagos, Nigeria.
HILL K.E. (1991) `Problems encountered by VH and PH students in mainstream Secondary Schools, in OZOJI E.D.,UMOLU J.U. & OLANIYAN S.O. (Eds) Contemporary Issues in Mainstreaming the Exceptional Child in Nigeria's 6-3-3-4 System of Education. NCCE, Jos, Nigeria.
HILL K.E. (1994) `Practical Science with Visually Impaired Nigerian Students'. The British Journal of Visual Impairment. 12 (1), 137-40.
HILL K.E. & JURMANG I. (1993) `Production and Adaptation of Local Materials for Teaching of Science and Mathematics to the Visually Impaired', in OZOJI E.D & NWAZUOKE I.K. (Eds) Education of the Exceptional Child in the 21st Century. NCEC, Jos, Nigeria.
HILL K.E. & JURMANG I. (1996a) `Changing Attitudes to Blind Students Participation in Science, Technology and Mathematics (STM) Classes 1980-1985', in NWAZUOKE I.A. & KOLO I.A. (Eds) Exceptional Persons in the Community NCEC, Ibadan, Nigeria.
HILL K.E. & JURMANG I. (1996b) Gindiri Conference for Parents of Blind Children. Deka Special Education Monograph, Deka Publications, Jos. Nigeria.
HILL K.E. & SHOWN D.G. (1995) Guidelines in the Teaching of Elements of Special Education of the Visually Impaired in Colleges of Educations in Nigeria. Jos University Press, Jos, Nigeria.
JAQUESS B.J. (1979) `Educational Provision for the Visually Handicapped in Nigeria' Unpublished Dip. Special Ed. (VH) Dissertation, University of Birmingham, U.K.
JURMANG I. HILL K.E. & MUGU Y. (1996) `The Pioneering Severely Visually Impaired Mathematics Student of the University of Jos, Nigeria. Journal of Research In Special Education, 1(1), 108-113.
LAOYE J.L. (1982) `Blind and Society in Nigeria', Unpublished, B.Phil. (Ed) Dissertation, University of Birmingham, U.K.

OBANI T.C. (1982) `A Study of some Factors Affecting Attitudes to Teaching the Handicapped Among Nigerian Teachers', Unpublished. M.Ed. Dissertation, University of Birmingham, U.K.
OGBUE R.M. (1981) `The Integration of Handicapped Children into Ordinary Schools', Unpublished. M.Ed. Dissertation. University of Southamton, U.K.
OKE C.S. & AJEIGBE R.A. (1996) `Attitudes of the Community Towards Blind Persons in Nigeria', in Nwazuoke I.A. & Kolo I.A. (Eds) Exceptional Persons in the Community, NCEC, Ibadan, Nigeria.
OZOJI, E.D. (1991) Psychology of Attitudes Towards the Disabled: The Nigerian Perspective, Department of Special Education, University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria.
OZOJI E.D. (1993) Special Education for the Non-Professional, Deka Press Publications, Jos, Nigeria.

Return to the top of this page